I am a human exceptionalist for the simple reason that human beings are exceptional. It is a tragedy if an animal dies, for example, mostly if human emotions were affected. The animal had no dreams or even plans. It had crude emotional attachments. Nonetheless, if it had any cognitive complexity it could have felt pain. I agree with conservatives who deny that those convenient fictions we call “rights” should extend to beings which are not rational enough to be part of moral communities. Nonetheless, when they accept that humans should be “kind” to animals they understate the implications of this. Ambiguity allows them to slip into its cloud. But quite simply, there is nothing “kind” about confining animals which enjoy space to cramped conditions; separating protective new mothers from their children; overfeeding creatures till they grow unnaturally large or executing them in often painful procedures. These are especially unkind if they are applied to million upon million of cows, pigs, ducks, goats, sheep and chickens and this whole unpleasant business is especially unkind if the amount of other nutritious and palatable food sources available ensures that most of these practices are entirely unnecessary. To put human and animal life on an equal footing would be to radically and irrationally revise our age-old understanding of proper relations between species but to oppose the enormous expansion and industrialisation of animal agriculture, with its essential coarsening of our appreciation of natural life, not to mention is to destructive effects on the environment, is to exhibit no idealism or Jacobinism but a decent respect for animal welfare that our ancestors would feel if they time travelled into seething, stinking modern superfarms.
-
Recent Posts
Interesting People
Things I Make
Archives
- February 2020 (2)
- December 2019 (2)
- October 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (3)
- December 2018 (4)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (2)
- September 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (4)
- May 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (2)
- December 2017 (1)
- November 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (5)
- June 2017 (5)
- May 2017 (7)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (8)
- February 2017 (9)
- January 2017 (13)
- December 2016 (15)
- November 2016 (15)
- October 2016 (17)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (11)
- July 2016 (11)
- June 2016 (11)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (6)
- March 2016 (6)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (6)
- December 2015 (1)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (1)
- September 2015 (3)
- August 2015 (9)
- July 2015 (13)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (2)
Categories
- America
- Anarchism
- Animals
- Appreciations
- Behaviour
- Belief
- Bias
- Blog
- Books
- Britain
- Communism
- Community
- Conservatism
- Economics
- Ethics
- Europe
- Extremists
- Family
- Fascism
- Fiction
- From the Archives
- Futurism
- God
- Health
- History
- Identity
- Ideology
- Language
- Liberalism
- Libertarianism
- Literature
- Love
- Media
- Mental Health
- Multiculturalism
- Nazism
- Organised Crime
- Personal
- Personalities
- Poetry
- Poland
- Politics
- Psychology
- Rationalism
- Religion
- Reviews
- Rhetoric
- Ritual
- Scepticism
- Science
- Sex
- Uncategorized
- Utopianism
- War
Meta
Yes, I agree entirely. Part of our exceptional nature is the fact that we can feel and express emotions such as kindness and compassion. Some animals may have these qualities in rudimentary form, but if it is at all widespread outside of human sensibilities then nature is keeping it very well hidden. Feeling and expressing kindness and compassion is good for us, as well as for the recipients, if such there be. We should be kind and compassionate just as cows should moo and ducks should quack.
LikeLike
Yes, indeed. We are the only animal that can civilise ourselves rather than being domesticated.
LikeLike