Assuming that fact claims that offend you must be false is wrong. Assuming that laws should spare you from offence is wrong. Seeking out that which offends you to indulge your psychic status as a victim is stupid, pathetic and wrong. Nonetheless, being offended is not itself wrong, and the sort of “cultural libertarian” who thinks that being above offence is virtuous is fooling themselves or so free from personal and cultural attachments as to become poignant. Offence is a mark of the strength of our loyalties, and an antibody against that which is perverse, malignant or malicious. Thus, it unites us as friends, families and citizens, and affirms our opposition to demagogues and degenerates. There are further qualifications to be made here. Transcending these responses can be virtuous, whether you are attorney representing a serial killer or a scientist testing an unpleasant yet plausible theory. But the response itself can be healthy.
-
Recent Posts
Interesting People
Things I Make
Archives
- February 2020 (2)
- December 2019 (2)
- October 2019 (1)
- September 2019 (1)
- July 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (1)
- April 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (3)
- December 2018 (4)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (2)
- September 2018 (2)
- July 2018 (4)
- May 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (1)
- March 2018 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- September 2017 (1)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (5)
- June 2017 (5)
- May 2017 (7)
- April 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (8)
- February 2017 (9)
- January 2017 (13)
- December 2016 (15)
- November 2016 (15)
- October 2016 (17)
- September 2016 (4)
- August 2016 (11)
- July 2016 (11)
- June 2016 (11)
- May 2016 (4)
- April 2016 (6)
- March 2016 (6)
- February 2016 (4)
- January 2016 (6)
- December 2015 (1)
- November 2015 (4)
- October 2015 (1)
- September 2015 (3)
- August 2015 (9)
- July 2015 (13)
- June 2015 (3)
- May 2015 (2)
Categories
- America
- Anarchism
- Animals
- Appreciations
- Behaviour
- Belief
- Bias
- Blog
- Books
- Britain
- Communism
- Community
- Conservatism
- Economics
- Ethics
- Europe
- Extremists
- Family
- Fascism
- Fiction
- From the Archives
- Futurism
- God
- Health
- History
- Identity
- Ideology
- Language
- Liberalism
- Libertarianism
- Literature
- Love
- Media
- Mental Health
- Multiculturalism
- Nazism
- Organised Crime
- Personal
- Personalities
- Poetry
- Poland
- Politics
- Psychology
- Rationalism
- Religion
- Reviews
- Rhetoric
- Ritual
- Scepticism
- Science
- Sex
- Uncategorized
- Utopianism
- War
Meta
Agreed, but I think that being offended is far less common than many would have us believe. If someone claims to be offended, I look carefully at what triggers their claim. Sometimes their claim is obviously genuine. Personal abuse, for example. But all too often, it is not even a case of them seeking out what offends them. It is a case of them seeking out what they disagree with, and then using feigned offence in order to add weight to their case. Or even for the brief hormonal squirt of sounding off about it.
Guardian CIF and the Daily Mail are good examples of this. There simply isn’t enough psychic space and energy in the world for that much offence.
LikeLike
I agree with that. Also, it’s important to distinguish (which I didn’t and perhaps should have done) between feeling offended and believing something is offensive. The line between disgust and offence would also be interesting to explore.
LikeLike