The Sporadic Sensitivity of Philip Larkin…

The exposure of hostile rhetoric aimed at immigrants, women and the poor diminished the posthumous reputation of Philip Larkin. Such insults were unearthed from his private correspondence, and had no harmful effects on any of their targets, but modern poets are judged almost as much by their opinions as by their art.

Averse as I am to such tedious purity rituals it was not pleasant to read of the life of Larkin. His relationships with women, which involved juggling a handful of on-off affairs over decades, was dishonest and undignified. The man who envisaged “Church Going” and “An Arundel Tomb” tended towards joylessness and narcissism.

Yet, somehow, this knowledge has enhances my appreciation of the poems. Larkin might have trudged through a life of familial stress, romantic dysfunction, voyeurism and morbidity but somehow, sometimes, his inner and outer lives aligned in such a way as to produce a moment of clear emotional beauty. A photograph made him think of the transient loveliness of women. A statue made him think of the enduring power of love. Then, after such moments of pure, spontaneous insight, he began a poem.

Advertisements

About bsixsmith

I am a writer of stories and poems - published by Every Day Fiction, The London Journal of Fiction, 365 Tomorrows and Det Poetiske Bureau - and a columnist for Quillette, Areo and Bombs & Dollars.
This entry was posted in Literature. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s